State v. McGill
State v. McGill
Opinion
ORDER
Sterling McGill (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of second-degree drug trafficking, in violation of Section 195.223 RSMo 2000. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior drug offender to ten years’ imprisonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.