Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

State v. Baugh

State v. Baugh
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 7, 2008 · Dowd, Ahrens, Sullivan
265 S.W.3d 880; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1360; 2008 WL 4472928 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Baugh

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Calvin L. Baugh appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing the trial court erred in admitting irrelevant evidence of uncharged crimes. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no error resulting in a manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 30.20 1 ; State v. Johnson, 220 S.W.3d 377, 385 (Mo.App. E.D. 2007). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2007, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.