Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Zeiser v. Tajkarimi

Zeiser v. Tajkarimi
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 30, 2008 · Richter, Mooney
265 S.W.3d 357; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1324; 2008 WL 4402443 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Zeiser v. Tajkarimi

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald K. Zeiser (hereinafter, “Zeiser”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Amir Tajkarimi and Three Rivers Systems, Inc. (hereinafter and collectively, “Three Rivers”) on his claim of breach of contract. Zeiser asserts Three Rivers had no defense against his claims for breach of contract and damages and was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the *358 reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.