Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church

Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 8, 2008 · Crane, Dowd, Romines
249 S.W.3d 278; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 479; 2008 WL 927576 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bi-State Pools v. United Baptist Church

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment denying its motion to set aside a judgment. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.