Lara v. State
Lara v. State
268 S.W.3d 421; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1040; 2008 WL 2962320
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Marriage of Highfill v. Thorne (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Antonio Martinez-Lara appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion, in which the motion court found that the failure of plea counsel to inform him of parole requirements was a collateral consequence of the plea, and, therefore, plea counsel was effective.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.