ORDER

Laura Fugate (hereinafter, ‘Wife”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving her marriage to Michael Fugate (hereinafter, “Husband”). Wife raises two points on appeal, challenging the propriety of the trial court’s actions with respect to an after-trial motion and the denial of Wife’s motion seeking to recuse the trial judge. Wife does not challenge the merits of the underlying judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).