*915 ORDER

Kristian G. Johnson (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction, in a court-tried case, for second-degree robbery. On appeal, Defendant argues that the State did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a persistent offender.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).