Lindemann v. City of Wentzville
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In the Interest of H.J.G. (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*264 ORDER
Robert and Susan Lindemann appeal the judgment of the trial court dismissing their exceptions in condemnation and petition for damages against the City of Wentzville. We find no error in the trial court’s determination. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1
. The City's motions to dismiss the appeal and for damages for frivolous appeal are denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.