ORDER

Ronnie Reeder appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Reeder argues that the trial court erred in admitting evidence during the sentencing phase of his trial. Reeder also contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to evidence during the sentencing phase of his trial, and for failing to present evidence during the guilty phase of his trial. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).