Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 28, 2008 · Richter, Mooney
266 S.W.3d 887; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1575; 2008 WL 4707360 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants’ claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *888 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.