OMR CORPORATION v. Bauer
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Szymula v. Pine Cedars, Inc. (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
The defendant tenants, Timothy and Catherine Bauer, appeal pro se the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the plaintiff landlord, OMR Corporation. Because the tenants’ claims are not preserved for our review, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided *888 with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.