SIKMAN v. Toker
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Mansfield (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Levent Sikman appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding in his favor on his claims for unlawful forcible entry and detainer and return of security deposit asserted against Suheyla Toker. 1 We find no error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
. Defendant Cenk Toroslu asserted a counterclaim against Sikman for personal injury. Sikman does not challenge that portion of the judgment that was entered upon the jury's finding in favor of Toroslu on his counterclaim.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.