Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Faulkner v. LEAR CORPORATION

Faulkner v. LEAR CORPORATION
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 23, 2008 · Dowd, Ahrens, Sullivan
269 S.W.3d 459; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1288; 2008 WL 4330326 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Faulkner v. LEAR CORPORATION

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Faulkner (Employee) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision *460 adopting the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision denying him workers’ compensation benefits and concluding that Employee’s injuries did not injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s decision is supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence, and is not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.