ORDER

Ricardo Elliot (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Sua Sponte Inquiry of Fraud and Abandonment Committed Against [Movant] and the Court by [his post-conviction counsel].” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).