Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Southwell v. Southwell

Southwell v. Southwell
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 25, 2008 · Dowd, Ahrens, Sullivan
271 S.W.3d 74; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1602; 2008 WL 5456244 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Southwell v. Southwell

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew J. Southwell appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Constance Southwell. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Ulreich v. Kreutz, 876 S.W.2d 726, 728 (Mo.App. E.D. 1994). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.