Young v. State
Young v. State
271 S.W.3d 61; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1530; 2008 WL 5447522
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Young v. State
Opinion
*62 ORDER
The movant, Tarron Young, appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2). '
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.