Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

State v. Rackley

State v. Rackley
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 19, 2008 · Dowd, Ahrens, Sullivan
260 S.W.3d 432; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1093; 2008 WL 3843341 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Rackley

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Rackley appeals his Judgment of conviction and sentence arguing the trial court erred in denying his Motion to Suppress Evidence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no error resulting in a manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. Rule 30.20 1 ;State v. *433 Johnson, 220 S.W.3d 377, 385 (Mo.App. E.D. 2007). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2007, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.