Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

BOCKHOFF v. Schulze

BOCKHOFF v. Schulze
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 5, 2008 · Hoff, Sullivan
247 S.W.3d 16; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 178; 2008 WL 304781 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

BOCKHOFF v. Schulze

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Bockhoff and Angela Bockhoff (Tenants) appeal from the amended judgment awarding Gene Schulze and Lois Schulze (Landlords) restitution for ejectment and $53,757.50 for breach of contract on Landlords’ counterclaim 1 in this action in which Tenants sought enforcement of a lease provision giving them the option to purchase the premises they leased from Landlords.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. The remaining counts of Tenants petition were subsequently dismissed prior to this appeal,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.