Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

DROEGE v. Norman

DROEGE v. Norman
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 2008 · Shaw, Norton, Odenwald
247 S.W.3d 606; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 361; 2008 WL 708792 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

DROEGE v. Norman

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Thomas D. Norman appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Respondent William J. Droege awarding $4,847.62 in damages and interest on the parties’ contract for chiropractic services. We have reviewed the briefs and the record, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.