Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Bauman v. United Parcel Service

Bauman v. United Parcel Service
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 29, 2008 · Crane, Dowd, Romines
244 S.W.3d 771; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 152; 2008 WL 222320 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bauman v. United Parcel Service

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, modifying the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Employer’s motion to dismiss claimant’s brief is denied as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.