Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Franklin v. State

Franklin v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 29, 2008 · Mooney, Shaw, Odenwald
244 S.W.3d 769; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 153; 2008 WL 222314 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Franklin v. State

Opinion

*770 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Lamark Franklin appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, after a hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.