ORDER

Leona Hackman appeals from a trial court judgment granting letters of conser-vatorship and appointing a conservator for her estate. Ms. Hackman argues that the trial court erred in granting the letters of conservatorship and appointing a conservator because there was not clear and convincing evidence of her disability. She further argues that the trial court did not apply the “least restrictive environment principle” in appointing a conservator.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).