Graham v. TELLE
Graham v. TELLE
293 S.W.3d 453; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 923; 2008 WL 2651876
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Jones v. Pierce (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Jim Graham appeals the judgment of the trial court sustaining Charles Telle’s motion for a directed verdict on Graham’s breach of contract claim. We find that the trial court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of Telle. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.