Eisenberg v. McKee
Eisenberg v. McKee
Opinion
*267 ORDER
Elizabeth Eisenberg (Eisenberg) appeals from the trial court’s Order and Judgment, which granted the Joint Motion for Summary Judgment, fried by Brad Goss and Barnet M. McKee, and found that the Agreement and Mutual Release signed by Eisenberg bars Eisenberg’s cause of action for legal malpractice against them. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.