Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008

Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo

Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 9, 2008 · Shaw, Crane, Hoff
272 S.W.3d 473; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1687 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stuart Goldenberg, P.C. v. Russo

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in plaintiffs favor in plaintiffs lawsuit to recover an amount owing for services rendered. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.