Kunkel v. Hertzog
Kunkel v. Hertzog
263 S.W.3d 735; 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112; 2008 WL 3895934
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Kunkel v. Hertzog
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jerry L. Hertzog and Helen Jane Hertzog appeal from a partial summary judgment granted in favor of Charles Kunkel, Jr. and Catherine M. Kunkel on the Kunkels’ claim for breach of contract and/or unjust enrichment. After a thorough review of the record and viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, we find that the Kunkels made a prima facie showing that summary judgment was proper and the Hertzogs failed to show that there was a genuine issue of material fact. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.