State v. Rubin
State v. Rubin
276 S.W.3d 881; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89; 2009 WL 307501
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Martin v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Marc S. Rubin appeals the judgment convicting him of stealing. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support Rubin’s conviction.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.