Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Ravenscraft v. MARION COUNTY AND DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

Ravenscraft v. MARION COUNTY AND DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 14, 2009 · Richter, Mooney
280 S.W.3d 790; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 457; 2009 WL 987423 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ravenscraft v. MARION COUNTY AND DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jill Ravenscraft (hereinafter, “Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (hereinafter, “the Commission”), denying her unemployment compensation benefits. Claimant raises two issues on appeal, claiming the Commission erred in applying the law to the facts.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.