Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Leskiw v. Breihan

Leskiw v. Breihan
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 1, 2009 · Norton, Hoff, Mooney
291 S.W.3d 376; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1228; 2009 WL 2750969 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Leskiw v. Breihan

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Lisa Leskiw (Leskiw) appeals from the Order and Judgment (Judgment) dismissing with prejudice Leskiw’s Petition for Damages (Petition) on the grounds of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and law-of-the-case. On appeal, Leskiw argues the trial court erred in sustaining Mark Allen Breihan’s (Breihan) Motion to Dismiss Petition (Motion to Dismiss) because the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and law-of-the-case are inapplicable and therefore the trial court lacked a basis for sustaining the Motion to Dismiss. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.