Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

State v. Williams

State v. Williams
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 1, 2009 · Sullivan, Dowd, Cohen
291 S.W.3d 373; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1224; 2009 WL 2748095 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Williams

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rollan Williams (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction,; after a jury trial, of one count of first-’ degree robbery, Section 569.020 RSMo 2000 1 (“Count I”), one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 (“Count II”), and one count of unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030 (“Count III”). Defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to ask the venire panel if they would require a gun in order to convict Defendant and in telling the jury to continue deliberating after the jury disclosed that jurors could not come to an agreement on counts I and II.

*374 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.