Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 9, 2009 · Crane, Hoff, Romines
284 S.W.3d 777; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 787; 2009 WL 1588706 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Johnson v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin A. Johnson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, following an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The motion court’s judgment is affirmed. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.