Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

State v. Hatten

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 9, 2009 · WD 69371 · Lowenstein, Ellis, Hardwick

284 S.W.3d 773; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 799; 2009 WL 1586008 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Richardson v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*774 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mark Hatten appeals his conviction for armed criminal action, § 571.015. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to show that he acted with the required intent for armed criminal action. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the conviction is supported by substantial evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.