Richardson v. State
Richardson v. State
304 S.W.3d 242; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1838; 2009 WL 5083434
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Richardson v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
James Richardson appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Richardson claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.