Valiant v. Valiant
Valiant v. Valiant
298 S.W.3d 588; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1733; 2009 WL 4639652
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Valiant v. Valiant
Opinion
*589 ORDER
Oliver Valiant (“Husband”) appeals the judgment finding, inter alia, Husband was in arrears on both his child support and maintenance obligations to Christina Valiant (“Wife”) and thus was in contempt of the orders awarding child support and maintenance to Wife, and ordering Husband to pay to Wife such arrearages, with interest, as well as Wife’s attorneys’ fees. We find the judgment was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.