Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Blaisdell v. Blaisdell

Blaisdell v. Blaisdell
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 13, 2009 · Sullivan, Dowd, Cohen
294 S.W.3d 140; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1486; 2009 WL 3260003 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Blaisdell v. Blaisdell

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Blaisdell appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion to Modify the Modified Decree of Dissolution (Motion to Modify) seeking to terminate his maintenance and life insurance obligations to Deborah Blaisdell. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Haynes v. Almuttar, 25 S.W.3d 667, 671 (Mo.App. W.D. 2000). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.