Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Hamilton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 13, 2009 · Norton, Hoff, Mooney

294 S.W.3d 138; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1495; 2009 WL 3260000 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. OBERHART (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Hamilton appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Hamilton argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

. All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2009).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.