Walker v. State
Walker v. State
285 S.W.3d 834; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 974; 2009 WL 1851089
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Walker v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Mark D. Walker appeals the circuit court’s order denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief in which he claimed that the State failed to disclose that its witness had prior convictions. After a thorough review of the record, we *835 conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A published opinion would have no prece-dential value; however, a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.