Foster v. State

ORDER

Daniel W. Foster, the movant, appeals pro se from the trial court’s denial of his motion to reopen his post-conviction relief proceedings alleging abandonment of post-conviction counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and no error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).