Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Smith v. State

Smith v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 15, 2009 · Sullivan, Dowd, Cohen
293 S.W.3d 122; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347; 2009 WL 2948738 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Smith v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry B. Smith appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.