Smith v. State
Smith v. State
293 S.W.3d 484; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417; 2009 WL 3170466
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Anthony Smith appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Smith claims that he was entitled to have the Rule 29.15 proceedings reopened because he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.