Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.

Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 22, 2009 · Crane, Ahrens, Baker
296 S.W.3d 487; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325; 2009 WL 3050918 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Busken v. Pulitzer, Inc.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in defendants’ favor in his action for damages for breach of his St. Louis Post-Dispatch Suburban Distributor Service Agreement. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.