ORDER

Mark Moore (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court on his conviction for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. Defendant argues the trial court plainly erred in denying his motion for continuance and in admitting evidence of the out-of-court identification of defendant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).