Sanders v. State
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- HASHMAN v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Charles Sanders appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction proceedings based on his claim that he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended *903 opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.