Griffith v. State
Griffith v. State
290 S.W.3d 842; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1209; 2009 WL 2750442
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Griffith (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*843 Order
Brock A. Griffith appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he presents two points, in which he claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to allegedly inadmissible testimony. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.