Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Gardner v. State

Gardner v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 2009 · Odenwald, Richter
297 S.W.3d 645; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1609; 2009 WL 3834094 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Gardner v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Gardner appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.