Dickens v. State
Dickens v. State
297 S.W.3d 673; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1677; 2009 WL 4545096
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Dickens v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Timothy Dickens, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.