Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Buehler v. Smith

Buehler v. Smith
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 29, 2009 · Sullivan, Dowd, Cohen
297 S.W.3d 604; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392; 2009 WL 3086004 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Buehler v. Smith

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Paul Smith appeals from the trial court’s judgments awarding Joan Buehler a portion of his monthly pension benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Zalmanoff v. Zalmanoff, 862 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Mo.App. E.D. 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.