ORDER

Tyrone Hamilton (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of possessing a controlled substance. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his motion to suppress drug evi *673 dence that Defendant discarded as police approached him.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).