Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Cunningham v. Clarke

Cunningham v. Clarke
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 15, 2009 · Draper III, George, Kurt, Odenwald, Richter, Roy
292 S.W.3d 587; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1348; 2009 WL 2949036 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cunningham v. Clarke

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Cunningham (hereinafter, “Cunningham”) filed an equity suit against Felix Clarke (hereinafter, “Clarke”) to either quiet title or partition the property located in Union, Missouri (hereinafter, “the Property”) and items of personal property. Clarke counter-claimed, seeking to have the Property and personal property sold at a partition sale. Following a bench trial, judgment was entered, quieting title of the Property in favor of Cunningham and dividing the personal property. Clarke brings this three point appeal, claiming the trial court erred in quieting title of the Property in favor of Cunningham.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.