Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Lancaster v. Carson & Coil, P.C.

Lancaster v. Carson & Coil, P.C.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 2009 · Div III: James M. Smart, Presiding Judge, Joseph M. Ellis, Judge and James E. Welsh, Judge
292 S.W.3d 379; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 972; 2009 WL 1851092 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Lancaster v. Carson & Coil, P.C.

Opinion

*380 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tim and Melissa Lancaster appeal from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Boone County dismissing their petition for damages against Respondents Carson & Coil, P.C. and Ronald McMillin. The circuit court found that the legal malpractice claims asserted by the Lancasters were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. A formal written opinion would have no precedential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.