*611 ORDER

Jerald Lindsey appeals the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to the escape rule. We find that the motion court did not err in dismissing Lindsey’s motion for post-conviction relief.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).